<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bike Intelligencer &#187; Wired</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/tag/wired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Electronic Gear Shifting: Good idea?</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2009/02/electronic-gear-shifting-good-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2009/02/electronic-gear-shifting-good-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Andrews, BI editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic gear shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountain Biking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shimano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.wordpress.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times takes a look at the latest electronic shifting iteration, from Shimano. Couple of interesting points: Time trialists can shift without changing position on the bars. But there is no manual override if the system fails. The article does not discuss weight or crash-worthiness, but Wired had this from an unidentified source: [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The New York Times </em><a  href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/14/sports/cycling/14gears.html">takes a look</a> at the latest electronic shifting iteration, from Shimano. Couple of interesting points: Time trialists can shift without changing position on the bars. But there is <em>no manual override</em> if the system fails.</p>
<p>The article does not discuss weight or crash-worthiness, but <em>Wired</em> <a  href="http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/news/2008/07/shimano">had this</a> from an unidentified source: &#8220;According to the company, Di2 will be 67 grams lighter than the current Dura-Ace 7800 and only 68 grams heavier than Dura-Ace 7900, the snazzy forthcoming 2009 suite of parts.&#8221; Not a huge weight differential, except in racing. But the drawbacks of e-shifting, including battery failure, may keep most of us away, especially given the premium ($4,000).</p>
<p>Also no comment on crashing. E-thingies tend to be a lot more fragile than their mech counterparts. That may not be so much a factor in racing, but for real-life use it could be make or break (so to speak!). As far as <strong>Bike Intelligencer</strong>&#8216;s first love, mountain biking goes, um, let&#8217;s just say an e-future isn&#8217;t in the cards any time soon.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be fun to try the system at some of the upcoming bike shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2009/02/electronic-gear-shifting-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
