<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bike Intelligencer &#187; velo news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/tag/velo-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lance&#8217;s Chances: Ironic Flashback of the Day</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/07/lances-chances-ironic-flashback-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/07/lances-chances-ironic-flashback-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Andrews, BI editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lance's Chances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lance armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tour de france 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[velo news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.com/?p=3787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Lance, Sunday was both the end of the beginning and the beginning of the end.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <em>VeloNews</em> coverage last Friday —</p>
<p><a  href="http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/07/news/armstrong-the-real-tour-starts-sunday_127635">&#8220;Armstrong: The real Tour starts Sunday.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Lance was both right and wrong. For most other General Classification favorites, the real Tour did start Sunday.</p>
<p>For Lance himself, it ended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/07/lances-chances-ironic-flashback-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for LeMond&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/02/waiting-for-lemond/</link>
		<comments>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/02/waiting-for-lemond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Andrews, BI editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greg lemond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lance armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trek lemond lawsuit settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[velo news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.wordpress.com/?p=1976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice folo from VeloNews on the Trek-LeMond settlement. You have to read between the lines here. From the judge&#8217;s questions, it looked virtually certain that Lance&#8217;s doping suspicions would be raised in the trial (Lance&#8217;s ex was barred by her attorney from answering questions during deposition about his doping). That would have put Trek under [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice <a  href="http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/02/news/lemonds-lawyer-hoped-to-bring-lance-armstrong-into-trek-dispute_103883/" target="_blank">folo</a> from <em>VeloNews</em> on the Trek-LeMond settlement. You have to read between the lines here. From the judge&#8217;s questions, it looked virtually certain that Lance&#8217;s doping suspicions would be raised in the trial (Lance&#8217;s ex was barred by her attorney from answering questions during deposition about his doping).</p>
<p>That would have put Trek under enormous pressure from Lance to keep him out of all this at a time when the Comeback Kid least wants negative publicity.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably an overstatement to suggest that Trek caved, but put it this way: Had Trek held the upper hand, there probably would be a gag on Greg against discussing any Armstrong connection.</p>
<p>As the <em>VeloNews</em> piece makes clear, there is not.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;ll continue to wait for word from LeMond re Lance (memo to <a  href="http://twitter.com/greglemond" target="_blank">@greglemond</a>: Whatever you feel about Lance, the guy knows how to use Twitter!). As we stated earlier, our preference would be a burying of the hatchet so these kings of the road could work together to promote cycling&#8217;s future in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/02/waiting-for-lemond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
