<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bike Intelligencer &#187; suspension technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/tag/suspension-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Paris-Roubaix: Was it the rider or the bike?</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/04/paris-roubaix-was-it-the-rider-or-the-bike/</link>
		<comments>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/04/paris-roubaix-was-it-the-rider-or-the-bike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Andrews, BI editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elastomer technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabian Cancellara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris-roubaix 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspension technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.com/?p=2757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If he'd been on a different bike, would Cancellara still have smoked the field?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cancellaraspecialized.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-2757" title=""><img src="http://bikeintelligencer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cancellaraspecialized.jpg" alt="" title="cancellaraspecialized" width="280" height="210" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2759" /></a></p>
<p><em>BikeRadar</em> is all over the equipment angle on Fabian Cancellara&#8217;s win on the brutal cobblestones of Paris-Roubaix 2010 (results <a  href="http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/04/news/cancellara-cruises-to-roubaix-triumph_111357">here</a>). Cancellara&#8217;s <a  href="http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/specialized-unveil-project-black-machine-for-saxo-bank-25644">Specialized ride</a> seems to have found the sweet spot between rigidity and compliance, using slacker angles, fatter tubing, wider tires and patented elastomer (&#8220;chewing gum&#8221;) inserts for damping while not overly mushing things up.</p>
<p>Interesting that Specialized is a mountain bike company that crossed over into road rather than the other way around, and it still brings an mtb orientation to the table. <a  href="http://www.tearsforgears.com/2010/01/full-suspension-at-paris-roubaix.html">Experiments have been done</a> over the years on the optimum setup for cobbled pavement in general, and P-R in particular, showing the detriments of traditional rigid and steep road technology. Yet telescoping suspension with actual travel apparently offers too much efficiency loss.</p>
<p>Undoubtedly bike tech will continue to refine along Specialized&#8217;s clever tweaks (putting the elastomers mid-stay was counter-intuitive but pretty smart). But until all the leaders ride the same bike, we&#8217;ll inevitably wonder: Was it the rider or the bike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/04/paris-roubaix-was-it-the-rider-or-the-bike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
