<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bike Intelligencer &#187; streetfilms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/tag/streetfilms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Streetfilms&#039; misguided video on RR tracks</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/02/streetsfilms-misguided-video-on-rr-tracks/</link>
		<comments>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/02/streetsfilms-misguided-video-on-rr-tracks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Andrews, BI editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missing link ballard burke-gilman trail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streetfilms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.wordpress.com/?p=2003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Streetfilms has put together a clip on how to cross railroad tracks on a bike, using Seattle&#8217;s &#8220;Missing Link&#8221; as an example. I wish I could say it does the trick, but in reality it feeds a lot of misguided mythologies about cycling. Ultimately, it says railroad tracks are something to be feared, and that [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Streetfilms has put together a <a  href="http://www.streetfilms.org/how-to-properly-cross-rail-tracks-on-your-bike/" target="_blank">clip</a> on how to cross railroad tracks on a bike, using Seattle&#8217;s &#8220;Missing Link&#8221; as an example. I wish I could say it does the trick, but in reality it feeds a lot of misguided mythologies about cycling. Ultimately, it says railroad tracks are something to be feared, and that somehow they&#8217;re really really hard to get across, and that the solution to any challenge involving RR tracks is to paint hugeass arrows and figurines scaring cyclists into BEING CAREFUL BECAUSE YOU&#8217;RE GOING TO CRASH! Which essentially contributes to the greater public perception that cycling is dangerous and should simply be avoided.</p>
<p>The teaser to the clip says crashing on RR tracks is &#8220;something I&#8217;ve seen even the most experienced cyclist do.&#8221; Really? I&#8217;ve been riding all my life and have never crashed on RR tracks. I&#8217;ve never been in a group of riders, experienced or otherwise, where a rider has crashed on RR tracks. I&#8217;ve never seen or been around a cyclist who blah blah blah. I&#8217;ve been told many times to be careful of RR tracks, and have wound up wondering why. As a kid I didn&#8217;t get the memo, and as an adult it&#8217;s never been a problem. I&#8217;m not saying crashes don&#8217;t happen, but I am saying this: In the pantheon of dangerous obstacles and momentous challenges facing a cyclist on an everyday basis in urban settings, RR tracks are way way down the list.</p>
<p>Now the accident data does indicate that the Missing Link tracks are problematic. And anyone, even a cyclist (we are sentient, despite the implications of condescending videos and traffic signs), can see that there&#8217;s a nasty angle to the crossing. But the solution isn&#8217;t cartoon characters on pavement and signs. The solution is to DO SOMETHING about the Missing Link. To its everlasting credit, Cascade Bicycle Club of Seattle has been pushing a fix here for years. And the city of Seattle has a <a  href="http://www.seattle.gov/Transportation/missinglink.htm" target="_blank">project</a> ready to go. Only litigation by selfish businesses and corporations has blocked the link from becoming &#8220;unmissing.&#8221; (None of which Streetfilms mentions.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to pick on Streetfilms here. They obviously meant well. But the road to perdition is paved with good intentions — not RR tracks. If Streetfilms wanted to show a real problem area, it could do a clip on a true nightmare: Westlake Avenue, where bikes not only have to ride parallel to streetcar tracks, but where there are sections of pavement lacking even clearance for bikes from the streetcar and/or traffic. Even there, though, the issue isn&#8217;t an inherent catastrophic nature of RR tracks. It&#8217;s piss-poor planning that never even considered bikes in the transportation matrix.</p>
<p>Otherwise our hope is that next time Streetfilms will try to pick a subject that doesn&#8217;t make cyclists seem like brain-damaged children who have to quake in their pedals every time they see two strips of iron supported by wooden planks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/02/streetsfilms-misguided-video-on-rr-tracks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
