<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bike Intelligencer &#187; seattle city attorney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/tag/seattle-city-attorney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Will Seattle Follow S.F. Attorney&#8217;s Taxpayer Advocacy?</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/09/will-seattle-follow-s-f-attorneys-taxpayer-advocacy/</link>
		<comments>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/09/will-seattle-follow-s-f-attorneys-taxpayer-advocacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Andrews, BI editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burke-gilman lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burke-GIlman Trail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle city attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.com/?p=4444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would Seattle city attorney file suit on behalf of taxpayers to recover lost monies from the obstructionist Burke-Gilman lawsuits?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense that if you sue to stop a Bicycle Master Plan and you ultimately lose after years of delaying implementation, you should have to <a  href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/cityinsider/detail?entry_id=72010">pay court costs</a>.</p>
<p>The question re businesses who <a  href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009520681_burkegilman23m.html">keep filing suit</a> to block completion of the Burke-Gilman Trail is: Will the Seattle city attorney&#8217;s office follow the same path?</p>
<p>According to the S.F. attorney&#8217;s office, &#8221;Aggressively pursuing the fullest possible recovery of the taxpayers&#8217; costs in litigation is a standard practice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quote from David Hiller, advocacy director for Seattle&#8217;s Cascade Bicycle Club:</p>
<blockquote><p>I hope the city protects the interests of its taxpayers in any and every way they can.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/09/will-seattle-follow-s-f-attorneys-taxpayer-advocacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
