<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bike Intelligencer &#187; fabian cancellara bike doping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/tag/fabian-cancellara-bike-doping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cancellara&#8217;s Bike Doping: Let&#8217;s be smart here</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/06/cancellaras-bike-doping-lets-be-smart-here/</link>
		<comments>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/06/cancellaras-bike-doping-lets-be-smart-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Andrews, BI editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabian cancellara bike doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team saxo bank mechanized doping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.com/?p=3321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A teeny battery-powered "motor" in a bike propelling a world-class cyclist to victory? Pshaw...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding whether Fabian Cancellara cheated by using a battery-propelled crank-assist mechanism in his bike, no one seems to have addressed an obvious question: Aren&#8217;t the bikes in pro races certified? They have to meet exacting specifications regarding structure and weight. Wouldn&#8217;t abnormalities turn up in inspection?</p>
<p>Tour de France coverage last year featured a segment on how time-trial bikes undergo rigorous inspections before the race.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re squarely in the camp that sniffs a hoax. Remember that at full output this unit only produces 100 watts, or a fraction of what a human produces at full sprint. This little unit might be able to power a freewheel raised off the ground, as the video shows. But it has far too little oomph to help a world-class cyclist, either over a long haul or in a short burst.</p>
<p>We doubt it can even propel forward a bike carrying a non-pedaling adult.</p>
<p>A nice publicity stunt for the perpetrators, but there are far better ways to spend our precious time than arguing this one.</p>
<p>See the original videos <a  href="http://www.bikebiz.com/news/32235/Former-pro-says-mechanised-doping-is-real">here</a>.</p>
<p>BikeHugger too is <a  href="http://bikehugger.com/2010/06/cancellara-conspiracy-doubter.html">skeptical</a>.</p>
<p>Cancellara says, <a  href="http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/06/news/cancellara-calls-motorized-bikes-claims-stupid-as-uci-looks-at-scanning-bikes_119452">Who, me</a>?</p>
<p>Cozy Beehive has engineering chops to provide a <a  href="http://cozybeehive.blogspot.com/2010/06/anatomy-of-cancellara-attack.html">colorful discussion</a> which, like laying all the economists in the world end to end, does not reach a conclusion.</p>
<p>Bicycle.net: Team Saxo Bank <a  href="http://www.bicycle.net/2010/insinuations-of-cheating-by-%E2%80%9Cmechanical-doping%E2%80%9D-strongly-rejected">vehemently denies</a> monkeying with bikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/06/cancellaras-bike-doping-lets-be-smart-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
