<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bike Intelligencer &#187; cyclist election results 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/tag/cyclist-election-results-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Overall Election Results a Mixed Bag for Cyclists</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/11/overall-election-results-a-mixed-bag-for-cyclists/</link>
		<comments>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/11/overall-election-results-a-mixed-bag-for-cyclists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Andrews, BI editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclist election results 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.com/?p=4792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A rundown of cyclist perspectives on election results from around the nation.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><strong>A rundown of perspectives</strong> on how cycling fared in Tuesday&#8217;s midterms suggests a retrenching for the coming two years. Most advocates acknowledge that support for climate and transportation legislation will find tougher slogging while also pointing out that their constituencies may get re-energized, rather than taking it for granted that elected leaders are working in their favor.</p>
<p>Our earlier (and updated) piece <a  href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/11/bike-friendly-candidates-do-well-in-washington-state/">on Washington State.</a></p>
<p><strong>BikePortland.org:</strong> <a  href="http://bikeportland.org/2010/11/03/national-bike-leaders-weigh-in-on-tumultuous-elections-42124">National leaders weigh in.</a></p>
<p><strong>Bicycle Retailer</strong>: A strong advocate <a  href="http://www.bicycleretailer.com/news/newsDetail/4739.html">meets defeat</a>.</p>
<p>Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel: Will Republican wave <a  href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/lifestyle/106697973.html">wash out bike lane</a>?</p>
<p><strong>BikingBis:</strong> Bike advocates <a  href="http://www.bikingbis.com/blog/_archives/2010/11/3/4671329.html">shift to defense</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Cyclelicious:</strong> a potpourri of <a  href="http://www.cyclelicio.us/2010/bicycle-news-11022010">election day news results</a>.</p>
<p><strong>BikesideLA</strong> updates <a  href="http://www.bikesidela.org/cyclists-bill-of-rights-good-news-and-bad-news/">Cyclist Bill of Rights</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/11/overall-election-results-a-mixed-bag-for-cyclists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
