<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Continued Thoughts on Crankworx Slopestyle Judging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/08/continued-thoughts-on-crankworx-slopestyle-judging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/08/continued-thoughts-on-crankworx-slopestyle-judging/</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 05:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/08/continued-thoughts-on-crankworx-slopestyle-judging/comment-page-1/#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.com/?p=4251#comment-2322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it kinda hypocritical of you when on one hand you talk about slopestyle being too dangerous. Then to say still give points for failed tricks.  i.e. I tried a quad back flip got paralyzed but at least I won.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it kinda hypocritical of you when on one hand you talk about slopestyle being too dangerous. Then to say still give points for failed tricks.  i.e. I tried a quad back flip got paralyzed but at least I won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
