Comments on: Paris-Roubaix: Was it the rider or the bike? http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/04/paris-roubaix-was-it-the-rider-or-the-bike/ All bike, all the time Tue, 21 May 2013 03:33:44 +0000 hourly 1 By: J http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/04/paris-roubaix-was-it-the-rider-or-the-bike/comment-page-1/#comment-962 J Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:18:49 +0000 http://bikeintelligencer.com/?p=2757#comment-962 Undoubtedly, it was the rider. No one else could even begin to hang at that level and 47
km to go. Let’s just hope we never find out that some other “magic” was involved, and that ut was all training periodization and skill.

]]> By: A Note on the Commercial logic of Cycling tribes-Roadies v MTBiker v BMXers and so on | Cycling Satin Cesena http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/04/paris-roubaix-was-it-the-rider-or-the-bike/comment-page-1/#comment-960 A Note on the Commercial logic of Cycling tribes-Roadies v MTBiker v BMXers and so on | Cycling Satin Cesena Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:34:33 +0000 http://bikeintelligencer.com/?p=2757#comment-960 [...] I want to do here is bring into focus the commercial dimension lurking within this. Paul Andrews puts the question in the wake of Fabian Cancellara's Paris-Robaix win: was it him or his [...]

]]> By: Richard Masoner http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/04/paris-roubaix-was-it-the-rider-or-the-bike/comment-page-1/#comment-952 Richard Masoner Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:33:40 +0000 http://bikeintelligencer.com/?p=2757#comment-952 Either way, it’s great PR for Specialized.

]]>