<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are 1,200 sharrows better than none?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/01/are-1200-sharrows-better-than-none-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/01/are-1200-sharrows-better-than-none-2/</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 05:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2010/01/are-1200-sharrows-better-than-none-2/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll take 1,200 sharrows over 1,200 bike lanes that put me in the door zone, which seems to be the current state of the art in Seattle.  2nd ave, dexter, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take 1,200 sharrows over 1,200 bike lanes that put me in the door zone, which seems to be the current state of the art in Seattle.  2nd ave, dexter, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
