<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Day in Doping: Alberto Contador?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeintelligencer.com/2009/07/this-day-in-doping-alberto-contador/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2009/07/this-day-in-doping-alberto-contador/</link>
	<description>All bike, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 05:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rosemary Barnes</title>
		<link>http://bikeintelligencer.com/2009/07/this-day-in-doping-alberto-contador/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosemary Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeintelligencer.wordpress.com/?p=1027#comment-150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish that people would stop assuming that every good cyclist is doped to the eyeballs. Cycling has the toughest testing programme of any sport, which has a lot to do with why there are so many people caught. I am not saying that a lot of pro cyclists use banned substances, but that these people are caught.
Contador and Armstrong, along with every other TDF rider are subject to a huge number of tests, both in and out of competition. There are random tests at any time of year, and if the rider isn&#039;t available when called in for a test, it counts as a positive.
So let&#039;s leave the task of determining the drug cheats to the anti-doping authorities, and get on with watching the tour.
As to the comment &quot;as longas Lance or Alberto or whomever brings big dollars and attention to the sport, any doping allegations are going to be downplayed.&quot; Rubbish! The more dominant and popular a rider is, the more doping is going to be alleged, even if the only &quot;evidence&quot; is that they went really fast! Why can&#039;t we allow these athletes the presumption of innocence until proven guilty? A lot of resources are devoted to catching drug cheats, especially in cycling and especially in the TDF, so let the process run its course.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish that people would stop assuming that every good cyclist is doped to the eyeballs. Cycling has the toughest testing programme of any sport, which has a lot to do with why there are so many people caught. I am not saying that a lot of pro cyclists use banned substances, but that these people are caught.<br />
Contador and Armstrong, along with every other TDF rider are subject to a huge number of tests, both in and out of competition. There are random tests at any time of year, and if the rider isn&#8217;t available when called in for a test, it counts as a positive.<br />
So let&#8217;s leave the task of determining the drug cheats to the anti-doping authorities, and get on with watching the tour.<br />
As to the comment &#8220;as longas Lance or Alberto or whomever brings big dollars and attention to the sport, any doping allegations are going to be downplayed.&#8221; Rubbish! The more dominant and popular a rider is, the more doping is going to be alleged, even if the only &#8220;evidence&#8221; is that they went really fast! Why can&#8217;t we allow these athletes the presumption of innocence until proven guilty? A lot of resources are devoted to catching drug cheats, especially in cycling and especially in the TDF, so let the process run its course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
